The Little Broomstick

LittleBroomstick-cov“Mary, a lonely girl at all times, is bored with the holiday she has to spend with her great-aunt in the rambling country house. Wandering aimlessly in the woods, she finds a cat, who leads her to a curious flower that she has never seen before. There is something odd, too, about the cat, and about a little broomstick in a pile of rubbish waiting to be burnt…

The cat, the flower and the mysterious broomstick combine to launch Mary into an extraordinary series of adventures involving spells, witchcraft and animals transformed… leaving her with a terrible choice to make and a frightening act to perform.

Mary Stewart brings to The Little Broomstick all the qualities for which she is so admired — excitement, fine description, humour, fascinating detail and sheer readability.”

[ Text from the book flaps ]

I have not commented on a book of fiction that is not a manga or comic in a very long time. And yet, this is just a short book of children literature… However, after commenting on the animated adaptation by Studio Ponoc, Mary and the Witch’s Flower, I felt compelled to read the novel. I was lucky to find in the library the very first edition of the book (1971, although it was a second impression, produced the same year). That edition is now rare, but the book has been recently reprinted. I guess it will constitute my official reading for Halloween!

Mary is bored. She tries to give a hand to Zebedee, the gardener, but she isn’t very helpful. She then goes for a stroll in the wood. There she meets a black cat and discovers a little clump of flowers such as she had never seen before. Later, Zebedee tells her that it’s called witch’s bell or tibsroot or fly-by-night. It’s rare as it blooms only once in seven years. And superstitious folks say it has magical power. He also tells her that the black cat is called Tib, and that he has a grey companion (his brother maybe) called Gib. But the grey one has not been seen in a while…

The next day, while trying to sweep up leaves in the courtyard with a broomstick too big for her, she discovers a little broomstick, just the right size for her. As she touches the little broomstick with her hands stained with the purple juice of crushed fly-by-night, the broomstick leap. Mary clings to it, trying to hold it between her legs, but it takes flight and bring her (and Tib) up in the sky, above the world so high! After crossing a thick fog, she finds herself in a strange place and lands near the Endor College for young witches. We meets Madam Mumblechook, the headmistress, and Doctor Dee. They think she’s a new pupil and she plays along (as “trespassers will be transformed”!). She visits the school, proves that she is a competent witch, steals a spell book and promises to come back for class the next morning. As she returns home, she realizes that Tib is missing.

Madam Mumblechook used a subterfuge to steal him in order to perform a transformation experiment on him. Mary goes back at night, finds Tib and use the Master Spell from the book she stole to restore Tib back into a cat (transforming back all the creatures and animals held captive by the school witches at the same time). She meets Peter, a boy from the village who is looking for his grey cat, Gib, and wandered in the magical world by accident while crossing some thick fog. They are discovered and escape on the broomstick, with Madam Mumblechook and Doctor Dee in hot pursuit. With the help of the animals that she had previously saved, they manage to escape and come back home safely.

The Little Broomstick offers a nice, simple story, beautifully written — as I’ve found it is often the case with British children literature. Strangely, when such stories are adapted into anime the story is usually simplified in order to fit the new medium, but it is the opposite in this case: the anime script-writers have added to the story to make it richer and more complex. In the original story it’s not Peter that is kidnapped, but the cats; there is no other nefarious use for the fly-by-night; no household member is involved in magic. The book is more straightforward and simple. And I like it that way.

Obviously, Mary Stewart is a skilled writer, although this is her first book for children. The language she uses is charming and her storytelling is full of rich descriptions. The book is a good thriller without being scary. It encourages kids (and here particularly girls) to be adventurous, to care, stand up for others and to do what’s right. It is simple enough to be enjoyed by kids, but with enough dept to also be appreciated by adults. All in all, The Little Broomstick is a nice, pleasant read wether you are a kid or not.

LittleBroomstick-illop35a

Illustration by Shirley Hugues

The Little Broomstick, by Mary Stewart (illustrated by Shirley Hugues). Leicester: Brockhampton Press Ltd, 1971. 128 pg. ISBN 0-340-15203-6. For a Middle Grade readership (age 8 to 12) and above. [The most recent edition is by Hodder Children’s Books, ISBN: 9781444940190, £6.99 / $10.75 US] stars-3-0

To learn more about this title you can consult the following web sites:

[ AmazonBiblioGoodreadsGoggleWikipediaWorldCat ]

Text © 1971 Mary Stewart • Illustration © 1971 Brockhampton Press Ltd. All rights reserved.

[ Traduire ]

About [not] reading

GreatAmericanReadI just watched The Great American Read on PBS, a show that searches for the “100 best-loved books and explores the many ways in which these novels affect, reflect and connect us all”. People are invited to vote for their favourite book in the list. It made me want to read more and wonder why I read so little.

I used to read a lot. As far as I can remember I often read books (novels, comics, books about space, about lost civilizations, about extra-terrestrials; all sort of books). My parents always encouraged us to read. I was spending long nights reading (and sometimes writing), particularly in the summer, when I didn’t have school the next day. I remember going to the public library (first, the one in the basement of our elementary school, and then the city library on top of the fire station). In my last year of high school, I remembered reading over a hundred books, mostly cheap science-fiction novels (space opera that freed my imagination and made me feel that everything was possible). Why did I stop reading so much? 

I was still reading a lot in college and in university (undergrad and grad school). That’s when I started reading also in English (first with L. Niven’s The Ringworld Engineers and Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings). Ironically, it’s only when I got busier with my publishing company that I seriously reduced my reading habit. Working hard (even at the library) takes much of my energy. Now I barely read twenty to fifty books a year, and it is mostly manga or comics. I guess I got lazy and life doesn’t leave me enough free time to read. I cannot read in the bus/subway anymore, I’m too tired. I read sometime on the weekends and more often than not before going to sleep. Mostly, I watch too much TV. It’s much easier to watch the movie version than read the novel; but it’s also an unfortunately diluted experience. A book is so much more than a movie. You can create your own visual of the story while the movie provide it for you…

On that Great American Read list, I’ve read only a dozen books: 1984 (G. Orwell), And Then There Were None (A. Christie), The Da Vinci Code (D. Brown), Dune (F. Herbert), Foundation (I. Asimov), A Game Of Thrones (G. R.R. Martin), The Grapes of Wrath (J. Steinbeck), Jurassic Park (M. Crichton), The Pillars of the Earth (K. Follett), The Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (D. Adams), The Little Prince (A. De Saint-Exupery) and The Lord of the Rings (J.R.R. Tolkien). There are many that I think I might have read, at least partially, or maybe I just saw the movie… I am not sure… But there are many, many more I just wish I had read. I will. I still have time. 

I just can’t wait to retire and I have the entire day to myself, with a nice cup of tea and a book!

I wish my entire life was only about books. Wait! It is: I work in a library and I write a blog (partially) about reading! Gosh! I should dedicated even more time to books…

Unfortunately, I cannot vote for the Great American Read. First, I am not American. Second, I haven’t read enough books in that list. And finally, I would have really a hard time deciding which book is my favourite… Each one has its own value and it’s difficult to compare one to another. They all had an impact on my life, because they all transmitted to me a valuable experience one way or another. But I have such a bad memory for those things… Maybe Dune, La nuit des temps (R. Barjavel), Neuromancer (W. Gibson), or Lord of the Rings ? I don’t know… Anyhow, you can follow my readings on Goodreads

And you, what are your favourite books?

[ Traduire ]

Boréal 2018

Boreal2018-banner

Boréal est de retour à Montréal pour son édition 2018! Le congrès québécois des littératures de l’imaginaire se tiendra du 4 au 6 mai 2018 au Temple Maçonnique de Montréal (2295 Rue Saint-Marc, près du métro Guy-Concordia). Le thème de la rencontre sera “Rétro/Futur” et les invités d’honneur seront Sabrina “David” Calvo, Martine Desjardins et Patrick Senécal. S’y ajouteront quelques invités spéciaux: Séléna Bernard, Jonathan Brassard, Isabelle Gaudet-Labine et Ariane Gélinas. Vous pouvez obtenir plus de détails et vous inscrire sur le site du congrès. Jusqu’au 1er avril, les inscriptions pour la fin de semaine complète sont en pré-vente à prix forfaitaire (Général: $35; Étudiant: $20; Soutien: $50; Enfants de moins de 12 ans: gratuit! Payable par PayPal ou carte de crédit). Au plaisir de vous y voir!

[ Translate ]

Genres et littératures

(0) Introduction

Je trouve qu’il y a souvent de la confusion concernant la définition des différents genres littéraires que ce soit parmi les simples lecteurs ou même parfois parmi les libraires et bibliothécaires. C’est particulièrement évident quand on regarde les notices bibliographiques du catalogue des bibliothèques de Montréal (qui sont souvent créées à partir de données fournies par la firme SDM). C’est une lacune déplorable sur un sujet qui est pourtant enseigné au CEGEP. Cela peut sembler trivial — après tout un bon livre demeure un bon livre qu’il soit de la SF ou un roman historique — mais j’ai toujours trouvé que la compréhension des choses commençait avec l’utilisation de la bonne terminologie et une définition claire, précise et exacte. Je vous offre donc ici un petit guide sur les genres littéraires qui ne se veut pas exhaustif mais qui vise simplement à introduire les principaux genres.

Pendant longtemps, les puristes ont considérés que la véritable littérature se limitait aux grands classiques romanesque, de la poésie et du théâtre (classiques anciens — avec des auteurs tel que Aristophane, Aristote, Cicéron, Euripide, Hérodote, Homère, Horace, Ovide, Platon, Socrate, Sophocle, Thucydide, Tite-Live, Virgile, Xénophon, etc. — ou classiques modernes — avec des auteurs tel que Austen, Balzac, Baudelaire, Brontë, Dickens, Dostoïevski, Dumas, Flaubert, Hemingway, Victor Hugo, Joyce, Molière, Montaigne, Maupassant, Proust, Shakespeare, Stendhal, Tolstoï, Voltaire, Zola, etc.), et qu’elle excluait tout autres genres de récits. Puis on a tranquillement accepté que la littérature populaire était une littérature à part, une para-littérature, avant de finalement admettre que les littératures de l’imaginaire et autres genres de récits populaires étaient indubitablement de la vrai littérature et pouvaient être étudiées comme telle. Évidemment, plusieurs des “classiques” cités plus haut sont considéré maintenant comme de la littérature de genre. Et cela n’empêche pas que je rencontre encore souvent aujourd’hui des collègues qui me disent que ce que publient des éditeurs comme Alire, un des rares éditeurs spécialisés en littérature de genres au Québec, ce n’est pas de la “vrai” littérature.

Je vais commencer par diviser les littératures en deux groupes: les littératures rationnelles, qui sont ancrés dans le réel, et les littératures de l’imaginaire, qui se déroulent dans un monde entièrement ou partiellement créé par l’auteur. Pour chacun de ces groupes, je vais vous présenter les principaux genres, les définir, en expliquer les sous-genres majeures et donner quelques exemples d’auteurs ou de titres.

Poursuivre la lecture avec: (1) Les Littératures rationnelles

[ Translate ]